When a person’s name is describe by word, such as “he/she (name) is good/evil”, his/her identity losses because the name should have no meaning at all but a plain identity of a person.
Many has been talking about ego, yet they are adding many names with descriptive words. People like to add the words that are good onto their own names, while throwing the bad to those whom they dislike. Ego or not ego, is and cannot be done just by adding words into the name. It can only be measured by your action. Saying that I am egoless is meaningless unless you have been trying to not add words into anyone’s name. You cannot fool people with your action no matter how beautifully you has described yourself.
The truth is, we cannot live without names and words, which that name is just a name and should have no meaning at all (although we prefer to have a name with meaning) and then the words that describe everything in our life. Only the problem is we put words into our names.
Money is something weird, it has a value, but it is not real. So if this virtual value exists in both material and spiritual world, what will it be in spirituality? It seems like the nearest term will be “dharma”.
Honestly, if I have a choice, I wouldn’t use this term. Sadly I can’t find any better one. It means something like your good doings will be “banked” (into metaphysics or spiritual means), and you can use it as cover up for your bad doings, the “karma”. Some say it recorded as “akashic record”, a system that archives everything in life. (Alright, I am not relating this with Hinduism or heaven and hell stuffs, just borrowing the words.)
Spirituality has long unvalued the darkness,
yet toss out the evil to show how it is unvalued,
which disturbs the devil to get the unvalued valued,
by tossing the freewill to make it alluded,
to teach a lesson that no light can be answered,
that the answer of the darkness has never been answered.
If darkness has had an answer,
it won’t be called as the darkness.
Everyone looks into the darkness and see a light which will be known,
but is seeing a different light which is unknowingly known.
Why should you stick with the known to explain the unknown?
How could the light can be expanded without the darkness?
Instead, by letting the wisdom to be expectingly unfold,
so the fool will not be fighting on what’s to be told.
If you want to find a darkness within the light,
no matter how bright but you can always identify,
conspiracy in good deed will never truly shine,
as long as you are not willing to unbind,
you are living in a delusion regardless of prime.
If you want to see a light within the darkness,
it doesn’t matter how dim if you are willing to try,
the devil’s has never destroyed the sight,
as long as you are not believing in disguise,
you are shining with light even you are fallen behind.